Archive for category journalism
Sink the love boat, step back from Twitter
Posted by Michal in journalism, social media on 07/05/2010
There are many things I can write about yesterday’s Election night, but I really want to mention two.
First, the mutual appreciation society on BBC One. The Corporation made a huge effort to provide its viewers with comprehensive election coverage, yet spoilt it all with its celebrity love boat. The sight of Brucie repeating his very tired “Nice to see you…” routine for the zillionth time on a boat full of B-listers angered me beyond belief. I don’t care what Bruce Forsyth, Piers Morgan, Mariella Frostrup or even Ian Hislop have to say. I just want to see the results and hear commentary and analysis from people who know what they’re talking about. Mariella and Brucie didn’t.
If politicians are disconnected, so is the BBC. Can the Corporation honestly justify spending licence fee money on a bunch of usual suspects who stuffed their faces with canapés and champagne and contributed virtually nothing? Why not go a step further and use the election night to promote another Lloyd-Webber show or ask Anton DuBeke to perform the cha cha every time new results are announced?
The second thing is Twitter. Or to be more precise, one its many facets, the one commonly known as the echo chamber effect. Don’t savage me. I’m not criticising Twitter or denying its role in the campaign. I was simply looking at the stream of disappointed tweets last night and earlier this morning. No, they didn’t win. No, Nick Clegg is not the saviour. Despite what Twitter might have led you to believe.
And yes, I know that the hindsight makes things easier, but the echo chamber quality of Twitter has been discussed before. Many wiser and more knowledgeable people have written more convincing things about it than me. But in case you don’t know it yet, Twitter does not necessarily reflect what the wider world thinks. Take its “wisdom of crowds” with a massive pinch of salt.
Because if I was to believe in what trends on Twitter, I would have to conclude that Justin Bieber is the biggest artist this planet has ever had.
Related articles by Zemanta
- General Election TV: BBC’s sinking ship of celebrities (telegraph.co.uk)
Don’t celebritise everything
Posted by Michal in journalism on 14/03/2010
Have I just invented a new word? Anyway, have to get it off my chest as I’ve been glancing at this tiny story in London’s Evening Standard since Friday when it was published. Despite its lenght, it annoys me immensely.
Here it is, page 2, last Friday:

The headline says “Estelle’s cousin spared jail over drugs”.
In other words, someone you never heard of got stopped by cops, went to court, got off lightly, didn’t go to jail. End of story. Worth the space on page 2? No.
What do you do to make it sexier (as you do with news nowadays)? You dig deep into their family connections hoping that the six-degree separation rule will link them to at least a Hollywood A-lister. No such luck here, but hey, we have a Grammy winner, let’s stick her name in the headline instead. And voila!
I know that we live in celebrity-obsessed times and unless something is endorsed by some mediocre girl-band singer-cum-talent judge or shagged by a footballer, it’s not worth mentioning. But this little piece should’ve been relegated to nibs (or “news in brief” for the uninitiated), somewhere on page 14. I’m not saying it’s not woth mentioning, I’m just saying it doesn’t deserve the space it was given and the celebrity treatment it didn’t need. (“Estelle was not present at today’s hearing” – you don’t say!).
It’s not just the Evening Standard, everyone is doing it. A few years ago another evening paper published a short story on a stabbing in which a young man died. It was 2007, teenage stabbings in London were at an all-time high, so how do you think that story was sold? Yes, that’s right, the stabbed boy was a certain well-known singer’s “close friend”. The story was illustrated with her picture. She wasn’t even quoted.
Such treatment at best shifts the focus of the story and at worst distorts the news completely. It’s unnecessary.
Not everything needs to be popular or sexy. Certainly not in news.
Keep calm and carry on (shooting)…
Posted by Michal in journalism, photography, photojournalism on 09/03/2010

If the recent media stories about the threat to our freedom to photograph in public places worry or anger you, don’t let them.
As for every “Photography under threat” headline, there’s an amazing story on how photography changes or at least influences lives .
So, don’t worry, photography is not under threat. It will be, when you stop shooting.
The fox on the tube – and what photographers can learn
Posted by Michal in journalism, photography on 08/12/2009
This is such a fascinating story – on many levels. But for photographers there’s one crucial lesson, which I’ll explain in a second.
A few days ago Kate Arkless-Gray, also known as @RadioKate, took this picture of an urban fox at Walthamstow tube station. It was late at night, the station was empty and the fox ran down the escalator only to be chased back up. And this is when Kate took the picture. With her iPhone. (She took another one with her Canon Ixus, both of which can be seen on her Flickr page).
Within hours of posting the image on Twitter, it went viral and captured the imagination of thousands of people worldwide. I read Kate’s updates on Twitter as she got more and more excited about the prospect of breaking yet another unexpected record number of views.
However, nothing has prepared Kate for the subsequent media reaction to this picture. Everyone, from the BBC to the Daily Mirror, from Metro to the Daily Telegraph picked up the story and ran the picture. Many bloggers – like Annie Mole or myself – picked it up too.
BBC Breakfast presenters had a chat about the fox and Japanese and other foreign media chase Kate for some more details and interviews. You can listen to the whole unbelievable story on Kate’s AudioBoo here:
But as a photographer and journalist I was fascinated by – and reminded of – one thing. It’s not the camera that counts, it’s the picture. Yes, it’s pretty obvious, but often forgotten.
In our endless pursuit of bigger, better cameras we forget that they won’t always necessarily give us pictures which capture our imagination. The tool almost doesn’t matter. Kate’s picture technically is far from perfect, but it hardly matters. Good photographers can take stunning pictures with almost any camera. Sometimes obviously they’re helped by the situation. (Although often even being the right person in the right place at the right time doesn’t help if you don’t trust your journalistic instincts or the sixth sense or whatever you want to call it – or simply can’t use the camera).
Earlier today I was looking at some of my early pictures taken with cheap, sometimes disposable cameras and I couldn’t help, but feel that they made me look at the world in a different way. They almost forced me to be more creative as – unlike all the modern gear, they didn’t offer that many fall-back options, if you know what I mean.
So let’s not obsess about the latest and the best – let’s think about what we can do with what we’ve got.
Kate’s fox also shows (again) the power of Twitter (as if we need another proof of its capabilities) in spreading information and reaching diverse audiences across the globe fast. A lot can also be said about media editors’ insatiable appetite for all things quirky and “fun”, but that’s probably something for a separate post.
The whole story with the picture reminded me of a quote I published months ago on my Tumblr. I cannot remember where I found it, so if you are its author and I can’t credit you – my apologies – but it succinctly captures the essence of what I wrote above:
An amateur photographer was invited to dinner with friends and took along a few pictures to show the hostess. She looked at the photos and commented “These are very good! You must have a good camera.”
He didn’t make any comment, but, as he was leaving to go home he said “That was a really delicious meal! You must have some very good pots.”
Image © Kate Arkless-Gray, used with author’s permission
1pound40 unconference – a couple of after-thoughts
Posted by Michal in journalism, social media on 15/11/2009

This week I managed to get to Thomson/Reuters’s swanky headquarters in Canary Wharf to take part in an unconference called 1pound40.
Some great minds – from journalists to social media specialists – spent the afternoon discussing the impact of social media on politics and news, among other things. Not surprisingly, Twitter became the main focal point of most of our sessions.
Whether we discussed the power of social media in changing politics or whether Twitter and social media in general can curate news, the discussions always became more general as we were all trying to define the influence of Twitter and other tools on our lives.
It’s impossible to summarise all our discussions and thoughts, but I’d like to mention two keywords that cropped up several times during the session and which will be quite important in our future discussion about social media. I list them here in no particular order of importance:
- transliteracy: not a new term, but an increasingly important one. I was lucky enough to share the table with professor Sue Thomas of Leicester University, who has been writing about transliteracy for years. Transliteracy is in my opinion a pre-requisite to a successful engagement with social media – or media in general. The ability to write, read and communicate across a wide variety of mostly digital, but also analogue platforms, and the ability to create value using the most appropriate tools and platforms for your needs is absolutely crucial. It’s surprising how many people who should be transliterate – journalists, for example – are still reluctant to embrace another medium and turn it into their advantage. Such approach is unsustainable and short-sighted. Period.
- curating content: in other words, trying to embrace the wealth of knowledge and information social media offer us. But how? Richard Sambrook asked whether Twitter and social media can curate news and provide a framework for trust. Yes they can, but with (sometimes severe) limitations. Should news companies like the BBC even curate content from Twitter? If so, how do you approach the issue of trust (by sticking to journalistic principles, I’d say – check, cross-check, verify – don’t just republish)? Curating content might be the way forward, but the biggest issue – after trust – is the volume of information. How do you cope with that? How do you filter it out? Twitter lists might be one solution, but Twitter is just one tool among hundreds available.
I’m hoping to explore the issue of content curation over the next few months, but your thoughts on it – or any of the above issues – are welcome.
(There are some pictures from 1pound40 over on my Posterous blog)
Do we control the tools?
Posted by Michal in journalism, social media on 08/11/2009
If you’ve ever used your mobile camera to photograph an event – be it a gig, somebody’s birthday party or a fellow passenger on the bus – and then subsequently posted the picture online for everyone to see, you must have asked yourself a question: is this morally ok to do that?
‘Cause if you haven’t, you might want to read this brilliant and rather shocking piece by Paul Carr, “After Fort Hood, another example of how ‘citizen journalists’ can’t handle the truth”. Whether you like Paul Carr or not, he’s made a few very valid points around the issues of privacy and morality of social media – and citizen journalists in particular – with two videos to back them up (warning: one of the videos contains graphic images of the final moments of Neda Agha-Soltan, killed during the Iranian election protests earlier this year). I won’t summarise the post here, please read it and draw your own conclusions.
Just don’t interpret Paul’s words as a sweeping statement which has little to do with reality. It isn’t. And I was reminded of it while reading this article about a man in south London, who brought traffic to a halt by threatening to jump off a building.
The incident lasted for hours and obviously attracted a large crowd. Some people shouted for him to jump. Others, as is obvious from the picture that accompanies this article, were filming or photographing the man.
Even without Paul Carr’s article I didn’t doubt for a moment that had the man jumped, the video would have been uploaded to YouTube within a matter of hours. Do you?
New York Times launches Lens
Posted by Michal in journalism, photography on 18/05/2009

Photography, video and photojournalism – the New York Times has just launched a new photoblog, called Lens.
I’m loving the fact that more and more newspapers – like The Daily Telegraph and the Daily Mirror and now NYT – go beyond the written word and quick videos and have separate blogs on photography and photojournalism.
They’re all different – some offer a peek behind the scenes, a look at the work of photojournalists, some offer tips, others are more personal.
Lens combines most of the above, but also seems to go a couple of steps further and beautifully redefines the traditional notion of a blog.
The first thing you’ll notice is the fact that Lens is – perhaps understanably – much more image-led and image focussed. Big, bold, strong images, which are often in fact multi-page galleries within individual posts, are definitely striking. The ability to go full screen is an added bonus.
The second, beutifully executed thing is the horizontal navigation. You just browse posts from left to right or right to left without necessarily delving into them. You can switch from gallery to a video, or another gallery and you can just focus on and savour the images. If you need more, you can always click on the actual post to get the full text, comments, keywords and all the other traditional blog extras.
And the content? As the short blurb on the site says,
Lens is the photojournalism blog of The New York Times, presenting the most interesting visual and multimedia reporting — photographs, videos and slide shows. A showcase for Times photographers, it also seeks to highlight the best work of other newspapers, magazines and news and picture agencies
So far the posts are centered mostly around some fascinating archive material, but there’s also room for Pictures of the Day, photographers’ profiles, a behind-the-scenes video from a photo-op with president Obama in the Oval Room and a couple of essays, one of which focuses on images with ugly white plastic chairs.
It’s a beautiful blog and I’ve just realised that for the past few paragraphs I’ve been gushing about it. So to counterbalance my excessive enthusiasm, I’ve tried finding something to criticise there.
I couldn’t. I love it.
And so should you.
Mirror images
Posted by Michal in journalism, photography on 13/04/2009

I’ve just discovered that Mirror.co.uk – of all places – has a great blog for all those interested in professional photography or photojournalism.
I also like it for another reason. It seems Mirror’s photographers are switching to the Canon 5d Mark II camera, which is the very same one I’m also planning to splash out on.
The 5d Mark II is one of the most powerful cameras Canon has recently produced, it boasts a new image processor, 21 million pixels, can shoot HD videos at 30fps and obviously a full-frame sensor too. So all the bells and whistles you’d normally get with the top-end Canon 1d series cameras, but aimed at an advanced amateur or semi-professional photographer. With a few extras thrown in for good measure.
I’ll keep an eye on the blog for some tips before I commit myself to this rather expensive purchase.
Oh, and I guess I need to find out whether I’m an advanced amateur or a semi-pro. Or just deluded.
Should journalists use Twitter?
Posted by Michal in journalism on 25/03/2009
(Is the pope Catholic?)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_c.png?x-id=36fded71-bb77-4e27-bfe3-f9ba0c7e3b90)

MY SOCIAL FOOTPRINT: