Archive for category kit
My nifty fifty
Every now and then I step out of my comfort zone and leave my lovely 24-104mm zoom lens at home. I take with me a lens I normally don’t use and try to spend a whole day taking pictures just with this one lens – and nothing more.
Last weekend I did that with Canon 50mm f1.8. And the past couple of days made me realise that in fact this is my favourite Canon lens so far.
After years of using zoom lenses or cameras with zoom capabilities, the ‘plastic’ 50mm was my first prime lens. Mainly because I couldn’t afford anything else.
At (then) under £60, the lens offered fantastic quality, great speed and opened a new world of prime lenses for me. I remember when I swapped my old zoom lens for this one – and initially couldn’t cope with its simplicity. What? No zoom? You actually need to step back/forward? No image stabilisation?
No, none of those things. But, unlike my previous f4.0 lenses, this one let so much light in that I quickly realised what I’d missed before: the ability to take portraits (as this is when this lens really shines) in low-lighting conditions.
It does take a few pictures to get used to this new reality, if you’ve never used a prime lens. But the rewards are fantastic: crisp, punchy images, fantastic depth of field and the ability to take great pictures in challenging lighting conditions.

So why do I love it so much? Here’s why:
- It allows you to separate your subject from the background and makes it more prominent.
- It challenges you to rethink, reframe, refocus. You can’t stand in one place and rely on your zoom. You have to move and make the effort to frame the image.
- It’s absolutely indispensable for portrait shots. Whether it’s just one person on their own or a face in the crowd, you can focus on them and make their face – or a particular feature of it – a strong focal point of your image.
- It’s incredibly fast. If your standard lens’s aperture is in the region of f3.5-4, then working with a lens which allows you to get crisp images at night with f1.8 makes all the difference. Combine it with a good DSLR, which is capable of producing images at ISO 1600+ without any visible noise and you can really enjoy an evening photo walk without a flash.
- On a bright sunny day you can take images at extremely fast shutter speeds and either get really sharp images, or you can increase the exposure time and experiment with excessive light.
- You learn a lot about depth of field by shooting with this lens in different circumstances.
- It’s really small and light.

This list is probably not exhaustive.
I know its price has gone up in recent years, but it’s still incredibly cheap and I can’t wait to use it again.
Do you have a nifty fifty and – more importantly – do you give it as much attention as it deserves?
Will mobile phones kill off low-end cameras?
Posted by Michal in kit, photography on 02/03/2010
What is your primary camera? Is it a DSLR? A lower-end pocket digital camera? Or is it a mobile phone?
Chances are it’s probably a combination of at least two devices, one of which is primarily used as a phone. I use a good DSLR, but for projects like The Best Camera I rely exclusively on my iPhone, which as we all know, is not particularly good at taking pictures.
More and more people use their mobile phones as a camera (or instead of one) as the quality of the images they produce has improved dramatically over the past few years. And according to a recent report by iSuppli, the low-end digital camera market is under great pressure from mobile phone manufacturers who release more better quality camera phones boasting, among other things, high resolution image sensors.
iSuppli forecasts that by 2013 the average mobile camera resolution will rise to 5.7 megapixels. Between 2008 and 2009 this resolution rose by 0.6 megapixels, from 1.5 to 2.1 Mp. Within the next three years compact digital cameras will be able to produce images which are, on average, up to 13.9 megapixels in size.
iSuppli reckons that with better image quality management tools mobile phone manufacturers might be able to persuade those who wouldn’t risk “a precious family photo” to ditch their compact cameras for better performing camera phones. It also predicts that Asian and European users will be more willing to make the jump.
It’s all fine and makes sense, but I’m surprised iSuppli in its report ignored one, crucial aspect of the whole issue: the ability to share your photos with the world instantly.
I guess this will be the real deciding factor here. Whether you’re at a gig, witnessing something newsworthy or just want to take a quick photo of something to share, you are probably less worried about the overall quality (which in most cases wouldn’t be that much better if you had a small compact camera on you anyway), but more about being able to share the image.
Mobile phones allow users to do MMS a picture, email it, share it instantly on Facebook, Twitter, other networking sites, upload to Flickr, Picasa, etc. Yes, in theory you could do the same with any camera and an Eye-Fi memory card, but your average Joe probably won’t bother with that. Plus most smartphones – and the iPhone in particular – have some great photo apps like the above mentioned Best Camera app.
So, yes, mobile phones are likely to put pressure and possibly even kill off lower-end cameras (if they haven’t already), but the number of pixels – even though it’s still used as a strong USP in marketing campaigns - will probably not be the most crucial of factors in the future.
Thoughts?
Stunning 7D advert
I know I wrote a few bitter words about Canon 7D when it was first released, mainly because of the annoying image problems.
But now they have been solved and Canon has released a stunning ad to promote the camera.
It’s beautifully shot… using Canon 7D itself. It features Feargus Kennedy, an award-winning wildlife photographer and forms part of a special campaign called Take stories, which also features other Canon cameras, including Canon 5D Mark II and EOS 450D.
Feast your eyes…

MY SOCIAL FOOTPRINT: