-
RECENTLY I WROTE:
- My short Roger Ballen film
- Silent World by Lucie & Simon
- Canon users, look away now
- A photographer’s journey – Paul Clarke
- iPhone photography Awards 2012
- King’s Cross – London’s newest photo destination
- All About Eve – the brilliant Eve Arnold exhibition
- One man, thirteen half-marathons
- Leaving Bush House
- The Flickr overhaul we’ve been waiting for?
favourites
- How to photograph people
- London photography from the upper deck
- My nifty fifty – Canon 50mm lens
- Photographing actors – my mini photo essay
- Sound advice for DSLR videomakers
- The Italian scooter
- The largest indoor photo – by Jeffrey Martin
- The miniature world of London commuters
- Video: A photographer's journey, part 1
- Why I swapped the Best Camera for Instagram
Archives
My Twitter updates
- Google Is In Total Denial About Its Huge Problem With Google+ http://t.co/PnSZzyhF posted 13 hours ago
- RT @Trushar: If you missed this yesterday, interesting inteview with @Hermida by @poynter about 'social journalism' and Twitter: http:// ... posted 1 day ago
- Canon SLR Cameras Used to Film Stunts in The Avengers http://t.co/ppY5OOzW posted 1 day ago
- NIH Study: Coffee Really Does Make You Live Longer, After All http://t.co/CJxpIRKI >> yay! cc @nat_bur posted 1 day ago
- Facebook’s Saverin on giving up citizenship: “This had nothing to do with taxes” http://t.co/s0E5J33a >> but of course posted 1 day ago
- RT @paul_clarke: "If you can't beat laser cat, you probably deserve to die" Great piece on Flickr woes http://t.co/yXGjFPOc posted 2 days ago
photography
multimedia and photojournalism
Me on Flickr
Javascript Flickr Badge, by Erik Rasmussen, requires javascript.Instagrams
Category Archives: software
Hipstamatic will not improve your photography
A recent look at the most populat iPhone photo apps revealed that Apple fans are in fact a very sentimental lot. Hipstamatic rules. iPhone users want their pictures to look more analogue, or retro and less clinical and bland.
And as much as I love Hisptamatic – with its choice of ‘lenses’, ‘films’ and ‘flashes’ (all electronically generated, for the uninitiated amongst you) – I still am very ambivalent about such apps. They make photography fun, no doubt about that, they do add an extra dimension to what otherwise would have been another mobile shot, but they also give a false sense of creativity.
A good friend of mine told me she’d fallen in love with Hipstamatic “because it allows me to do what you do in Photoshop but without Photoshop”. (I hardly use Photoshop. Lightroom, yes, but not Photoshop, and certainly not to make my pictures look like faded Polaroids. But that’s a different story.)
Someone else told me their pictures look so much better with Hipstamatic.
And that’s the problem. Many Hipstamatic users think they are ‘creative’, while in fact all they get is just a different quality print. And by quality I mean colours mostly. The composition or indeed the subject are not enhanced by the app – they’re still in the hands of the photographer. Therefore many Hipstamatic pictures, actually most of the ones I’ve seen, are bland or actually very bad. They do look different, particulary if compared with similar, untreated mobile snaps (after all Hipstamatic works with a 3mp mobile camera only), but they don’t necessarily make any of us more creative or turn us into better photographers.
The usual rules of composition still apply, the framing is still important and so is the subject. Hipstamatic will not improve anyone’s mediocre skills, I’m afraid.
Which is not to say we shouldn’t have fun with apps like Hipstamatic. Or its sister retro app, SwankoLab, which doesn’t allow you to take pics, but helps “develop” existing ones in a digitally recreated old-fashioned darkroom. Like Hipstamatic, it’s a lot of fun. But that’s what SwankoLab, Hipstamatic or The Best Cam are – fun apps and nothing more.
And like with many apps, the novelty will soon wear thin, the specially-created Flickr groups will overflow with thousands of mass-produced pics and we’ll jump on the next big thing.
For now however, retro is in.
Testing Aperture 3

So I made the jump. I’ve downloaded Aperture 3, the 30-day trial version. Just to see what the fuss is all about.
I’ve been using Lightroom for a few years now and I’m quite happy – and more importantly, familiar with – its workflow, quirks, abilities and shortcomings. But Apple’s generous gesture (doesn’t happen often) of allowing us mere mortals to test drive something for free for a month meant I couldn’t resist. Even if that meant losing almost a gigabyte of space on my hard drive (that’s how big the software is).
So I have 30 days to decide whether all those nice tutorial videos promising fantastic cool features mean much or whether Apple is simply repackaging Lightroom’s existing functionality and applying its usual glossy finish to deliver a shinier, but comparable tool.
I should probably compare the latest version of Aperture with the beta release of Lightroom 3, but to be honest I’m more interested in determining which package copes better with the functions I use every day rather than which package offers redundant functionality, which makes great headlines, but remains unused. I’m hoping to test the extras too (although I do realise that what I consider extras someone else may view as essential functionality), but my aim is clear: I need to know whether for the basic, day-to-day functions it actually makes sense to make the jump.
If you, like me, are also looking for an answer to this question, I’ll post something on this subject in the next, er, 30 days. But hopefully sooner.
If you have however made up your mind already, I’d love to hear what you have to say.














