Posts Tagged iphone

One more try

I installed WordPress for iPhone when I first got the phone, but, apart from comment moderation, I haven’t used the app for blogging as such. Which is as shame, as the plans were grand. As always.

But maybe my long commute will motivate me to use it more often. Let’s see whether I perservere or go back to reading Metro.

(Oh, and I can upload pics too? Marvellous! Here’s one from the weekend by the river).

No Comments

Time lapse on the iPhone

Judging by the queues outside Apple Stores everywhere yesterday, we should expect a deluge of iPhone 4 HD videos, well, right about now.

In the meantime, Phillip Bloom posted an interesting iPhone time lapse video of a Florida sunset. It was shot, rendered and edited using the iTimelapse app.

I’m tempted to play with it over the weekend, it’s only £1.79 from the App Store, looks pretty cool and you don’t need the latest iPhone to shoot a time lapse vid:

Thoughts? Have you used the app?

Enhanced by Zemanta

, ,

No Comments

The best photo apps for the iPhone

The best according to me, I hasten to add, as this is a very subjective list of my favourite iPhone photo applications. I know there are hundreds of apps for photographers, but I’ve been using these for months and can pretty much say these are the best in terms of creativity, fun and functionality.

The order is random, although as you will see, I use some of these more often than others.

Hipstamatic (£1.19)

One of those applications which capture the imagination of both photographers and casual users. The Hipstamatic for iPhone is, according to its creators,

an application that brings back the look, feel, unpredictable beauty, and fun of plastic toy cameras from the past.

And indeed, it’s both fun and unpredictable. The basic version of the app comes with three interchangeable lenses, three different types of film and two flashes. Each of the components produces different results and when combined they offer some amazing ‘analogue’ images.

They come out slightly darkish, blotchy and discoloured. And this old-fashioned, sentimental quality of Hipstamatic prints is exactly what appeals to so many users.

I like:

  • the interface is lovely and easy to use
  • you can choose to develop high quality prints
  • the choice of extras – lenses, films, flashes – gives users a lot of flexibility
  • you can also enter your photos to various Hipstamatic competitions

I don’t like:

  • the classic viewfinder can be annoying due to its size; you can switch to ‘precision framing’, but it’s equally small
  • you need to pay for every extra lens, film or flash, but you can’t really blame the creators for wanting to make some extra money on what is a very successful application

ShakeItPhoto (£0.59)

Also known as fauxlaroid. Like with Hipstamatic, it’s all about sentimentality and recreating the analogue past on your iPhone. In this case, it’s about getting Polaroid prints on your screen.

Having tested several photo apps, I’ve recently realised that what I really value about the best ones is their simplicity. And ShakeIt couldn’t be simpler. You take a photo, decide whether to use it or not, then wait a few seconds (you can shake the phone to develop it faster – this is an unnecessary gimmick, IMHO) and you get a nice Polaroid-like print. Slightly saturated, with a bit of vignetting and the characteristic white frame.

Currently ShakeIt has replaces Hipstamatic as my top photo app. Mainly thanks to the fact that it doesn’t require any additional settings and is simple to use. Which is important bearing in mind we’re talking about mobile photos here.

I like:

  • virtually no options, which is actually an advantage, makes it very easy to use and enjoy
  • prints come out quite big

I don’t like:

  • the ‘shake it’ function only justifies the app’s name and makes use of iPhone functionality, but doesn’t contribute anything and is theferore a useless gimmick (it doesn’t really recreate the Polaroid experience, IMHO)

Best Camera (£1.79)

For a long long time, Chase Jarvis’s ‘simplified Photoshop’ app was my favourite photo app. Not only does it allow users to modify images in a simple way, but also adds a social element to the whole experience.

Each photo can automatically be published no only to individually configurable social networking sites, but also to the Best Camera ongoing contest page. Each user also gets a mini-portfolio, where all Best Cam uploads are collected.

I’ve seen some really good professional photographers having fun with The Best Cam pictures. Its very simple interface allows users to apply one of several available effects (Vignette, Warm, Candy, etc.), crop and frame an existing image. (Unlike the previous two apps, The Best Cam doesn’t allow users to take new photos, it only works with existing images.)

It’s actually pretty amazing to see what this little app can do to seemingly mundane pictures – I took the pic above during my lunch break – the original looked like this:

The Best Cam version of the pic got 21 thumbs up and over 240 views during the time it was displayed on the Best Camera home page. Not bad for a random lunchtime shot, eh?

I like:

  • its simplicity
  • its social aspect
  • it allows you to stumble upon and discover new photographers via their mini-portfolios

I don’t like:

  • it would be nice to have more options sometimes – I wouldn’t even mind paying for some more advanced extras
  • the tile mosaic which displays recently uploaded pictures sometimes crashes or displays the same pictures over and over again

SwankoLab (£1.19)

Another application which helps develop rather than take pictures. SwankoLab, from the makers of Hisptamatic, is another “let’s go back to analogue” app, which attempts to recreate the analogue darkroom experience on the tiny Apple screen.

And swanky it is indeed. This is the app for which the iPhone was invented. As its makes say, SwankoLab is

a darkroom kit [...]; a loving recreation of the pre-digital era classic. Choose chemicals, process photos, and experiment!

And that’s exactly what you do. You choose the picture you want to ‘develop’, then reach for the chemicals you want to use (they come with useful descriptions which use modern, Photoshop-compatible terminology), mix them together and see what happens.

If you’re not particularly adventurous, you can always use some ready-made formulas. The app comes with its own sound effects and also offers the ability to annotate prints, email them or save to your photo library.

You can extend the app by purchasing additional ‘chemicals’ from Uncle Stu’s darkroom catalog.

I like:

  • the virtually endless possibilities – mix’n'match till you find your perfect formula
  • slick interface, likely to appeal to sentimental photographers trying to re-live pre-digital darkroom experiences and to those who care less about photography but simply like their apps funky

I don’t like:

  • this is my personal preference, but the simplicity of apps like ShakeIt makes SwankoLab seem a bit gimmicky
  • missing the ability to share on Facebook or Twitter straight from the app
  • no Flickr integration
  • despite all these formulas, the prints don’t have a distinctive feel and look and look a bit bland

Photoshop.com Mobile (£ free)

Need I say more? Probably the most widely-used photography software in the world, yet the iPhone/mobile version doesn’t seem to have that many fans.

I rarely use it, if I have to be honest. If and when I do, I reach for it when I need functionality which is not available elsewhere, like a flexible crop tool.

It is a decent application which offers most of the very basic tools that are available to Photoshop users and more. Apart from cropping you can also straighten images (very useful and very easy to apply), you can flip and rotate them too.

Adjusting exposure is very simple – just move your finger across the screen to change the values and see the final outcome. Adjusting everything else – from saturation to contrast – is equally simple.

The iPhone/mobile version of Photoshop also comes with a few effects and a choice of borders, but its best asset is definitely its choice of the classic Photoshop tools. You can’t beat that.

I like:

  • Facebook integration, you can also use your Adobe ID if you’ve got one
  • no need to use sliders to make adjustments
  • instant preview

I don’t like:

  • it integrates with Twitpic, but why only TwitPic?
  • it doesn’t remember the last image, always starts from zero, which I find annoying
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

, , , , , , , ,

3 Comments

Hipstamatic will not improve your photography

A recent look at the most populat iPhone photo apps revealed that Apple fans are in fact a very sentimental lot. Hipstamatic rules. iPhone users want their pictures to look more analogue, or retro and less clinical and bland.

And as much as I love Hisptamatic – with its choice of ‘lenses’, ‘films’ and ‘flashes’ (all electronically generated, for the uninitiated amongst you) – I still am very ambivalent about such apps. They make photography fun, no doubt about that, they do add an extra dimension to what otherwise would have been another mobile shot, but they also give a false sense of creativity.

A good friend of mine told me she’d fallen in love with Hipstamatic “because it allows me to do what you do in Photoshop but without Photoshop”. (I hardly use Photoshop. Lightroom, yes, but not Photoshop, and certainly not to make my pictures look like faded Polaroids. But that’s a different story.)

Someone else told me their pictures look so much better with Hipstamatic.

And that’s the problem. Many Hipstamatic users think they are ‘creative’, while in fact all they get is just a different quality print. And by quality I mean colours mostly. The composition or indeed the subject are not enhanced by the app – they’re still in the hands of the photographer. Therefore many Hipstamatic pictures, actually most of the ones I’ve seen, are bland or actually very bad. They do look different, particulary if compared with similar, untreated mobile snaps (after all Hipstamatic works with a 3mp mobile camera only), but they don’t necessarily make any of us more creative or turn us into better photographers.

The usual rules of composition still apply, the framing is still important and so is the subject. Hipstamatic will not improve anyone’s mediocre skills, I’m afraid.

Which is not to say we shouldn’t have fun with apps like Hipstamatic. Or its sister retro app, SwankoLab, which doesn’t allow you to take pics, but helps “develop” existing ones in a digitally recreated old-fashioned darkroom. Like Hipstamatic, it’s a lot of fun. But that’s what SwankoLab, Hipstamatic or The Best Cam are – fun apps and nothing more.

And like with many apps, the novelty will soon wear thin, the specially-created Flickr groups will overflow with thousands of mass-produced pics and we’ll jump on the next big thing.

For now however, retro is in.

Enhanced by Zemanta

, , ,

10 Comments

The fox on the tube – and what photographers can learn

Fox © Kate Arkless-GrayThis is such a fascinating story – on many levels. But for photographers there’s one crucial lesson, which I’ll explain in a second.

A few days ago Kate Arkless-Gray, also known as @RadioKate, took this picture of an urban fox at Walthamstow tube station. It was late at night, the station was empty and the fox ran down the escalator only to be chased back up. And this is when Kate took the picture. With her iPhone. (She took another one with her Canon Ixus, both of which can be seen on her Flickr page).

Within hours of posting the image on Twitter, it went viral and captured the imagination of thousands of people worldwide. I read Kate’s updates on Twitter as she got more and more excited about the prospect of breaking yet another unexpected record number of views.

However, nothing has prepared Kate for the subsequent media reaction to this picture. Everyone, from the BBC to the Daily Mirror, from Metro to the Daily Telegraph picked up the story and ran the picture. Many bloggers – like Annie Mole or myself – picked it up too.

BBC Breakfast presenters had a chat about the fox and Japanese and other foreign media chase Kate for some more details and interviews. You can listen to the whole unbelievable story on Kate’s AudioBoo here:

Listen!

But as a photographer and journalist I was fascinated by – and reminded of – one thing. It’s not the camera that counts, it’s the picture. Yes, it’s pretty obvious, but often forgotten.

In our endless pursuit of bigger, better cameras we forget that they won’t always necessarily give us pictures which capture our imagination. The tool almost doesn’t matter. Kate’s picture technically is far from perfect, but it hardly matters. Good photographers can take stunning pictures with almost any camera. Sometimes obviously they’re helped by the situation. (Although often even being the right person in the right place at the right time doesn’t help if you don’t trust your journalistic instincts or the sixth sense or whatever you want to call it – or simply can’t use the camera).

Earlier today I was looking at some of my early pictures taken with cheap, sometimes disposable cameras and I couldn’t help, but feel that they made me look at the world in a different way. They almost forced me to be more creative as – unlike all the modern gear, they didn’t offer that many fall-back options, if you know what I mean.

So let’s not obsess about the latest and the best – let’s think about what we can do with what we’ve got.

Kate’s fox also shows (again) the power of Twitter (as if we need another proof of its capabilities) in spreading information and reaching diverse audiences across the globe fast. A lot can also be said about media editors’ insatiable appetite for all things quirky and “fun”, but that’s probably something for a separate post.

The whole story with the picture reminded me of a quote I published months ago on my Tumblr. I cannot remember where I found it, so if you are its author and I can’t credit you – my apologies – but it succinctly captures the essence of what I wrote above:

An amateur photographer was invited to dinner with friends and took along a few pictures to show the hostess. She looked at the photos and commented “These are very good! You must have a good camera.”

He didn’t make any comment, but, as he was leaving to go home he said “That was a really delicious meal! You must have some very good pots.”

Image © Kate Arkless-Gray, used with author’s permission

, , ,

1 Comment