-
RECENTLY I WROTE:
- A quick trip back to Sorrento
- Vimeo relaunches with new features
- You wait for a bus…
- The miniature world of London commuters
- Some sound advice
- LCDVF: an entry-level viewfinder for DSLR film-makers
- Time for a refresh
- Google+ gets a new lightbox
- Hampshire frozen in time (capsule)
- What the new Canon C300 can do
favourites
Archives
My Twitter updates
- RT @the99percent: The Counter-Intuitive Benefits of Small Time Blocks - http://t.co/xvbJR0lo #recent99 posted 17 hours ago
- So, whose Pinterest boards are worth following? posted 17 hours ago
- Saturday colours - red http://t.co/UQ1OzFFI posted 19 hours ago
- Saturday colours - orange http://t.co/nb3WbRdK posted 19 hours ago
- Lovely: Red Fox Pouncing in Snow by Tin Man http://t.co/9zeWYmVF posted 20 hours ago
- RT @TheMediaTweets: DO NOT EAT THE YELLOW SNOW! -> RT @fieldproducer: Not sure they thought this through - the UK Met Office has issu ... posted 21 hours ago
photography
multimedia and photojournalism
Me on Flickr
Javascript Flickr Badge, by Erik Rasmussen, requires javascript.Instagrams
Tag Archives: iphone
Instagram gets a refresh – aka Instagram v 2.0
If you haven’t updated to the latest version of Instagram – released today – do so.
They have reworked the app to give it a new interface, improve functionality and add some new filters. What’s more, all filters now come with live preview.
The previous update also enabled users to add selective blur, but the experience wasn’t great. Now, the tilt-shift functionality has been improved and adding selective blur has been made really easy and fast.
You can also decide whether to use frames or not, plus you can rotate images, which was impossible before.
You will now be able to save all Instagram images in high resolution on your phone. Until now, IG images were 612x612px in size, from today you can save 1936x1936px images on the iPhone 4 or 1536×1536 on the iPhone 3GS. More importantly, the high-res images are only available to you and won’t be available in the same resolution via third-party apps or sites using Instagram’s API, giving you more control over your images.
More on today’s release on Instagram’s blog.
Two new(ish) Instagram features I like
I say new(ish) as one of them is definitely new, but the other one might have been around for a while and I have only just spotted it.
Since its inception Instagram has been adding one feature here one feature there and slowly has become really robust. The latest update gives users the ability to see which images they’ve liked on Instagram. Until now you liked something and within five minutes it was forgotten. Unless you remembered the photographer’s name, or unless the image was tagged, you couldn’t find it again. Now you can. If you update to the latest version (v1.18.17), you gain an extra option called “Photos you’ve liked”. They are displayed as a grid, but it’s easy to switch to a feed view as well. Instagram displays the latest 32 photos you liked, but you can obviously load more. A simple addition, but it makes Instagram more appealing and sticky.
The other feature I only noticed this morning shortly before I updated the app, so I assume it’s been there for a some time. When I looked at my News tab – which so far consisted of messages telling me someone was following me, liked a photo or left a comment on it – it also told me one of my Twitter friends had just joined Instagram. Which was quite useful again and much easier than scrolling the same list every few weeks or so just to see who else has joined Instagram in the meantime.
Now all they need to do is to create a nice web interface – some images do look better on a bigger screen, don’t you think? Or, since they’ve already made their API available to third-party developers, they can buy one of the many existing web apps created to display and interact with Instagram images.
My favourite one so far is Extragr.am (that’s where the above screengrab of my IG images comes from) and it’s a really easy way of navigating your (and your friends’) images on a bigger screen.
If you are on Instagram, do follow me – I’m michald on there. It’s worth it
DSLR pictures on Instagram. Do they bother you?
The iPhone, initially derided for its poor camera quality, has undoubtedly convinced many amateur, semi-professional and professional photographers to expand their photographic horizons.
Hundreds of apps, with hundreds of effects, have made quirky, interesting, weird, vintage etc. photography an everyday phenomenon. People have been able to go beyond web-based sites to share their photography and acquire new techniques and often many new fans.
The words iPhoneography and iPhoneographer, however clumsy, have entered our daily vocabulary. iPhone images are present everywhere – from iPhone-specific apps and galleries, to online photo-sharing sites and news outlets.
But should it work the other way round? Should non-iPhone images ‘infiltrate’ iPhone-native apps like Instagram?
I’ve noticed more and more DSLR-quality images being posted on Instagram and initially I wasn’t quite sure how I felt about it. On the one hand, why not? Pictures are pictures, right? No matter how or where you take them. If you can add iPhone images to Flickr, why not add DSLR images to Instagram? It’s all part of the fun.
Yet iPhoneography is about using the iPhone to take – and modify – your images. The clue is in the name. So what motivates people who post their photoshopped-to-death images on Instagram? And can adding non-iPhone images to services like Instagram or Hipstamatic be seen as cheating?
Well, try this Flickr discussion. Started by someone totally outraged by such practices:
I hate when I see pictures taken with profesional cameras, why do people do that? flickr is for that not instagram !!!
says Hans Stockholm. And instantly gets backed by a bunch of people who also find it equally outrageous that Instagram can be used in such a way. Some claim it’s simply uninteresting.
But then you have people like pdexposures, who seems to be absolutely fine with that:
Sounds like some people need to get their panties out of a punch. It’s a photo sharing program, I share iPhone shots, Dslr, 35mm, polaroids, instax and more types of film on my stream. None of My followers complain and they often lead to discussions about other forms of photography including tips and tricks about the medium that shot was taken in.
I had my knuckles rapped after my criticism of Hipstamatic (or rather: my criticism of one person’s reliance on Hipstamatic as a source of creativity). That discussion polarised people, although a few came to my defence. And it seems the latest “should we/should we not” iPhoneography discussion has gone the same way.
There are similar discussions all over the web. On getsatisfaction.com official Instagram reps admit they themselves find this issue a bit confusing and get plenty of support from other Instagram purists. On the same site, however, another similar thread has been hijacked by the ‘whatever’ camp.
I use Instagram to upload iPhone images only. I prefer it this way. I did upload one DSLR image once, then someone asked me whether it was taken with the iPhone and I felt like a cheat. Taking photos with the iPhone requires certain skills – from the way you handle the phone, to how you deal with shutter delay to how you see and frame the world through the screen. Therefore when I see a good image taken with the iPhone – regardless of whether Instagram filters enhance it or not, or whether it’s been modified using other iPhone apps on top of Instagram - I know this guy has mastered a particular skillset. And I like that. But that’s just me. I understand many people won’t care about whether an image came from the phone or a high-end DSLR camera as long as it’s ‘nice’.
So where do you stand?
From Instagram to NCIS: Los Angeles
If you read my previous post about Instagram, you know I’m a convert. It’s a fun app. It offers good value for no money – particularly after the latest update. Now it has also crossed into ‘traditional’ media – television to be more precise. But first, the update.
The latest incarnation of Instagram offers several enhancements, most notably the ability to create tilt-shift images. Overnight, just like that, a relatively new and until recently niche technique has gone mainstream. Obviously there’s no comparison between a real tilt-shift lens and a digitally applied effect, but it’s now out there for everybody to use and abuse. Watch it become the next HDR.
Another enhancement is the revamped news feed. You can now see who your friends follow, what images they like and left comments on. Through that I’ve already discovered a few great pictures I would have not seen otherwise – and users I would have not noticed. Separately, you can now see what happens with your profile and images – who follows you and what they like.
What I think Instagram is missing is the ability to revisit the images you liked. I often ‘like’ or bookmark images I find inspiring or original to look at them in more detail later. Instagram doesn’t offer such functionality. And because you can’t go back go what you liked a few days ago, everything feels temporary and disposable.
Now, the TV bit. For an app which is just over six months old to strike a big deal with a major TV network must be huge.
A few days ago Instagram and CBS, the producer of NCIS: Los Angeles, announced their “Flaunt Your City” campaign. It’s a mutual promotion. Instagram users can access behind-the-scenes images taken on the set of NCIS: Los Angeles, but their own images can become part of the series too. Users are encouraged to take images of unique or iconic places in their cities and share them via Instagram using the hashtag #NCISLA. One photo will be chosen by the cast and producers and the winning entry will be featured in the season finale on May 17.
That’s a massive publicity win for Instagram. At this rate, it’s likely to quickly expand its existing base of 2m+ users, who collectively upload over 290K images a day.
Good luck to Burbn, the makes or Instagram and good luck to whoever takes the winning image. Hope it’s not tilt-shift.
Why I swapped The Best Camera for Instagram
I’ve been resisting it for months. Instagram, the iPhone app everyone seems to be using at the moment. (I was tempted to say “Instagram, the latest fad” here, but I’m sure it would come back to bite my ass.)
I thought I didn’t need yet another photo app on my phone, yet another way of sharing my images. But a rapidly growing number of friends and online contacts have been using the app over the past few weeks and I was simply curious. I knew it combined the ease of use with a social aspect and some funky visual effects a la Hipstamatic. I also knew there were other similar apps like the Best Camera or Camera +, which offered similar functionality, but which never managed to achieve the critical mass Instagram has probably already achieved. And I was curious why the Best Camera, a precursor of Instgram, never really managed to do what the latter did in less than 6 months. So I installed it.
Do I need to explain what it does? Wired described Instagram as “Twitter for your photos” or “a mashup of Hipstamatic and Tumblr” last October and that was pretty much spot on. You sign up, you follow some people, or not, you take pictures, tag them, apply filters and publish. Then you also cross-post to other services like Facebook, Twitter, Posterous or Flickr, favourite other people’s images, leave comments and look at the most popular images from all over the world.
And that’s, pretty much what Chase Jarvis’s The Best Camera does too. I’ve been using this app for almost two years and enjoyed it so far. So why is Instagram better?
The most obvious answer is the social aspect, which is missing from The Best Camera. Chase Jarvis enabled voting, but that’s as far as the social aspect of that app goes. Instgram allows you to automatically follow all your Twitter and Facebook followers who’ve also installed the app, it scans your contacts to see who else has signed up. Comments, likes and the ever-changing sets of ‘popular’ images make the whole social experience complete. Pity Chase Jarvis didn’t add such features to his otherwise great app.
But the social aspect in itself is not the only reason why Instagram is spreading like wildfire.
The Best Camera offers users several simple filters. Each of them does one thing. One makes an image warmer, another increases saturation. Yet another allows you to add a vignette or crop your image. You can apply just one or a number of filters in many ways. Therefore, from my experience at least, the Best Camera has appealed to photographers or people who love experimenting with their images.
Instagram, like Hipstamatic, assumes you just want your image to look funky and simplifies the process by giving you a choice of filters. You choose just one, you can’t combine them. So, rather than thinking which individual aspects of the image to change, you are presented with several versions of the image and you just choose one.
The whole app comes with a visually pleasing interface, which also helps a lot. And its very easy to use. What not to like about it.
So, against my better judgement, I have just added yet another tool to my dangerously long list of social and/or photo apps. If you want to follow me on Instagram, I’m there as michald.
For now, at least.
Saved by the phone. Again.

Typical. You schlep a bag full of gear hoping to take a couple of decent shots and the world conspires against you. (It doesn’t, in fact, it’s all in your mind.)
Then one day you walk to work early in the morning, bleary-eyed and in need of a really strong coffee, when you spot a fantastic photo opportunity. That heavy bag would come in handy but, sadly, it’s having a day off…
If you need yet another proof that a decent camera phone (I’m ignoring its obvious technical limitations here) is as good as many entry-level DSLRs, here it is.
I took the above picture with my iPhone on the way to work yesterday. The only thing that bugged me was the fluff on my lens, which I cleaned with my fingers (try that with a standard DSLR lens). But other than that I was quite happy with the outcome.
As I was rushing, I only took two pics and posted one of them, the better one, on Flickr.
“Wow, gorgeous! Which app?”, asked my friend, a photo editor for a well-known magazine, when she saw the picture. None. No tweaking. No Hipstamatic or Camera Bag. Just as it came out. OK, a pure coincidence, but hey, that’s how many pictures we like are taken.
Londonist chose the image for one of its posts, and some of my Twitter followers and friends seemed to be impressed too. Which always feels fantastic.
Another proof, as if one was needed, that it’s not about – or at least it shouldn’t be about – the gear. In some circumstances at least. But I’m not telling you anything new, you knew that already, right?
What’s probably more interesting about the picture is the bike. As someone pointed out in comments on Flickr, the same bike was there a couple of days earlier.
Part of the installation or a coincidence? Answers on a postcard…
One more try
I installed WordPress for iPhone when I first got the phone, but, apart from comment moderation, I haven’t used the app for blogging as such. Which is as shame, as the plans were grand. As always.
But maybe my long commute will motivate me to use it more often. Let’s see whether I perservere or go back to reading Metro.
(Oh, and I can upload pics too? Marvellous! Here’s one from the weekend by the river).
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Time lapse on the iPhone
Judging by the queues outside Apple Stores everywhere yesterday, we should expect a deluge of iPhone 4 HD videos, well, right about now.
In the meantime, Phillip Bloom posted an interesting iPhone time lapse video of a Florida sunset. It was shot, rendered and edited using the iTimelapse app.
I’m tempted to play with it over the weekend, it’s only £1.79 from the App Store, looks pretty cool and you don’t need the latest iPhone to shoot a time lapse vid:
Thoughts? Have you used the app?
The best photo apps for the iPhone
The best according to me, I hasten to add, as this is a very subjective list of my favourite iPhone photo applications. I know there are hundreds of apps for photographers, but I’ve been using these for months and can pretty much say these are the best in terms of creativity, fun and functionality.
The order is random, although as you will see, I use some of these more often than others.
Hipstamatic (£1.19)
One of those applications which capture the imagination of both photographers and casual users. The Hipstamatic for iPhone is, according to its creators,
an application that brings back the look, feel, unpredictable beauty, and fun of plastic toy cameras from the past.
And indeed, it’s both fun and unpredictable. The basic version of the app comes with three interchangeable lenses, three different types of film and two flashes. Each of the components produces different results and when combined they offer some amazing ‘analogue’ images.
They come out slightly darkish, blotchy and discoloured. And this old-fashioned, sentimental quality of Hipstamatic prints is exactly what appeals to so many users.
I like:
- the interface is lovely and easy to use
- you can choose to develop high quality prints
- the choice of extras – lenses, films, flashes – gives users a lot of flexibility
- you can also enter your photos to various Hipstamatic competitions
I don’t like:
- the classic viewfinder can be annoying due to its size; you can switch to ‘precision framing’, but it’s equally small
- you need to pay for every extra lens, film or flash, but you can’t really blame the creators for wanting to make some extra money on what is a very successful application
ShakeItPhoto (£0.59)
Also known as fauxlaroid. Like with Hipstamatic, it’s all about sentimentality and recreating the analogue past on your iPhone. In this case, it’s about getting Polaroid prints on your screen.
Having tested several photo apps, I’ve recently realised that what I really value about the best ones is their simplicity. And ShakeIt couldn’t be simpler. You take a photo, decide whether to use it or not, then wait a few seconds (you can shake the phone to develop it faster – this is an unnecessary gimmick, IMHO) and you get a nice Polaroid-like print. Slightly saturated, with a bit of vignetting and the characteristic white frame.
Currently ShakeIt has replaces Hipstamatic as my top photo app. Mainly thanks to the fact that it doesn’t require any additional settings and is simple to use. Which is important bearing in mind we’re talking about mobile photos here.
I like:
- virtually no options, which is actually an advantage, makes it very easy to use and enjoy
- prints come out quite big
I don’t like:
- the ‘shake it’ function only justifies the app’s name and makes use of iPhone functionality, but doesn’t contribute anything and is theferore a useless gimmick (it doesn’t really recreate the Polaroid experience, IMHO)
Best Camera (£1.79)
For a long long time, Chase Jarvis’s ‘simplified Photoshop’ app was my favourite photo app. Not only does it allow users to modify images in a simple way, but also adds a social element to the whole experience.
Each photo can automatically be published no only to individually configurable social networking sites, but also to the Best Camera ongoing contest page. Each user also gets a mini-portfolio, where all Best Cam uploads are collected.
I’ve seen some really good professional photographers having fun with The Best Cam pictures. Its very simple interface allows users to apply one of several available effects (Vignette, Warm, Candy, etc.), crop and frame an existing image. (Unlike the previous two apps, The Best Cam doesn’t allow users to take new photos, it only works with existing images.)
It’s actually pretty amazing to see what this little app can do to seemingly mundane pictures – I took the pic above during my lunch break – the original looked like this:
The Best Cam version of the pic got 21 thumbs up and over 240 views during the time it was displayed on the Best Camera home page. Not bad for a random lunchtime shot, eh?
I like:
- its simplicity
- its social aspect
- it allows you to stumble upon and discover new photographers via their mini-portfolios
I don’t like:
- it would be nice to have more options sometimes – I wouldn’t even mind paying for some more advanced extras
- the tile mosaic which displays recently uploaded pictures sometimes crashes or displays the same pictures over and over again
SwankoLab (£1.19)
Another application which helps develop rather than take pictures. SwankoLab, from the makers of Hisptamatic, is another “let’s go back to analogue” app, which attempts to recreate the analogue darkroom experience on the tiny Apple screen.
And swanky it is indeed. This is the app for which the iPhone was invented. As its makes say, SwankoLab is
a darkroom kit [...]; a loving recreation of the pre-digital era classic. Choose chemicals, process photos, and experiment!
And that’s exactly what you do. You choose the picture you want to ‘develop’, then reach for the chemicals you want to use (they come with useful descriptions which use modern, Photoshop-compatible terminology), mix them together and see what happens.
If you’re not particularly adventurous, you can always use some ready-made formulas. The app comes with its own sound effects and also offers the ability to annotate prints, email them or save to your photo library.
You can extend the app by purchasing additional ‘chemicals’ from Uncle Stu’s darkroom catalog.
I like:
- the virtually endless possibilities – mix’n'match till you find your perfect formula
- slick interface, likely to appeal to sentimental photographers trying to re-live pre-digital darkroom experiences and to those who care less about photography but simply like their apps funky
I don’t like:
- this is my personal preference, but the simplicity of apps like ShakeIt makes SwankoLab seem a bit gimmicky
- missing the ability to share on Facebook or Twitter straight from the app
- no Flickr integration
- despite all these formulas, the prints don’t have a distinctive feel and look and look a bit bland
Photoshop.com Mobile (£ free)
Need I say more? Probably the most widely-used photography software in the world, yet the iPhone/mobile version doesn’t seem to have that many fans.
I rarely use it, if I have to be honest. If and when I do, I reach for it when I need functionality which is not available elsewhere, like a flexible crop tool.
It is a decent application which offers most of the very basic tools that are available to Photoshop users and more. Apart from cropping you can also straighten images (very useful and very easy to apply), you can flip and rotate them too.
Adjusting exposure is very simple – just move your finger across the screen to change the values and see the final outcome. Adjusting everything else – from saturation to contrast – is equally simple.
The iPhone/mobile version of Photoshop also comes with a few effects and a choice of borders, but its best asset is definitely its choice of the classic Photoshop tools. You can’t beat that.
I like:
- Facebook integration, you can also use your Adobe ID if you’ve got one
- no need to use sliders to make adjustments
- instant preview
I don’t like:
- it integrates with Twitpic, but why only TwitPic?
- it doesn’t remember the last image, always starts from zero, which I find annoying
Posted in photography, software
Also tagged best camera, hipstamatic, photography, photoshop, shakeit, shakeitphoto, Smartphone, SwankoLab
3 Comments
Hipstamatic will not improve your photography
A recent look at the most populat iPhone photo apps revealed that Apple fans are in fact a very sentimental lot. Hipstamatic rules. iPhone users want their pictures to look more analogue, or retro and less clinical and bland.
And as much as I love Hisptamatic – with its choice of ‘lenses’, ‘films’ and ‘flashes’ (all electronically generated, for the uninitiated amongst you) – I still am very ambivalent about such apps. They make photography fun, no doubt about that, they do add an extra dimension to what otherwise would have been another mobile shot, but they also give a false sense of creativity.
A good friend of mine told me she’d fallen in love with Hipstamatic “because it allows me to do what you do in Photoshop but without Photoshop”. (I hardly use Photoshop. Lightroom, yes, but not Photoshop, and certainly not to make my pictures look like faded Polaroids. But that’s a different story.)
Someone else told me their pictures look so much better with Hipstamatic.
And that’s the problem. Many Hipstamatic users think they are ‘creative’, while in fact all they get is just a different quality print. And by quality I mean colours mostly. The composition or indeed the subject are not enhanced by the app – they’re still in the hands of the photographer. Therefore many Hipstamatic pictures, actually most of the ones I’ve seen, are bland or actually very bad. They do look different, particulary if compared with similar, untreated mobile snaps (after all Hipstamatic works with a 3mp mobile camera only), but they don’t necessarily make any of us more creative or turn us into better photographers.
The usual rules of composition still apply, the framing is still important and so is the subject. Hipstamatic will not improve anyone’s mediocre skills, I’m afraid.
Which is not to say we shouldn’t have fun with apps like Hipstamatic. Or its sister retro app, SwankoLab, which doesn’t allow you to take pics, but helps “develop” existing ones in a digitally recreated old-fashioned darkroom. Like Hipstamatic, it’s a lot of fun. But that’s what SwankoLab, Hipstamatic or The Best Cam are – fun apps and nothing more.
And like with many apps, the novelty will soon wear thin, the specially-created Flickr groups will overflow with thousands of mass-produced pics and we’ll jump on the next big thing.
For now however, retro is in.











![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_c.png?x-id=a0331a3e-28c7-40b5-bec8-e2af7ecf9bca)












