-
RECENTLY I WROTE:
- My short Roger Ballen film
- Silent World by Lucie & Simon
- Canon users, look away now
- A photographer’s journey – Paul Clarke
- iPhone photography Awards 2012
- King’s Cross – London’s newest photo destination
- All About Eve – the brilliant Eve Arnold exhibition
- One man, thirteen half-marathons
- Leaving Bush House
- The Flickr overhaul we’ve been waiting for?
favourites
- How to photograph people
- London photography from the upper deck
- My nifty fifty – Canon 50mm lens
- Photographing actors – my mini photo essay
- Sound advice for DSLR videomakers
- The Italian scooter
- The largest indoor photo – by Jeffrey Martin
- The miniature world of London commuters
- Video: A photographer's journey, part 1
- Why I swapped the Best Camera for Instagram
Archives
My Twitter updates
- Google Is In Total Denial About Its Huge Problem With Google+ http://t.co/PnSZzyhF posted 14 hours ago
- RT @Trushar: If you missed this yesterday, interesting inteview with @Hermida by @poynter about 'social journalism' and Twitter: http:// ... posted 1 day ago
- Canon SLR Cameras Used to Film Stunts in The Avengers http://t.co/ppY5OOzW posted 1 day ago
- NIH Study: Coffee Really Does Make You Live Longer, After All http://t.co/CJxpIRKI >> yay! cc @nat_bur posted 1 day ago
- Facebook’s Saverin on giving up citizenship: “This had nothing to do with taxes” http://t.co/s0E5J33a >> but of course posted 1 day ago
- RT @paul_clarke: "If you can't beat laser cat, you probably deserve to die" Great piece on Flickr woes http://t.co/yXGjFPOc posted 2 days ago
photography
multimedia and photojournalism
Me on Flickr
Javascript Flickr Badge, by Erik Rasmussen, requires javascript.Instagrams
Tag Archives: iphone
Hipstamatic will not improve your photography
A recent look at the most populat iPhone photo apps revealed that Apple fans are in fact a very sentimental lot. Hipstamatic rules. iPhone users want their pictures to look more analogue, or retro and less clinical and bland.
And as much as I love Hisptamatic – with its choice of ‘lenses’, ‘films’ and ‘flashes’ (all electronically generated, for the uninitiated amongst you) – I still am very ambivalent about such apps. They make photography fun, no doubt about that, they do add an extra dimension to what otherwise would have been another mobile shot, but they also give a false sense of creativity.
A good friend of mine told me she’d fallen in love with Hipstamatic “because it allows me to do what you do in Photoshop but without Photoshop”. (I hardly use Photoshop. Lightroom, yes, but not Photoshop, and certainly not to make my pictures look like faded Polaroids. But that’s a different story.)
Someone else told me their pictures look so much better with Hipstamatic.
And that’s the problem. Many Hipstamatic users think they are ‘creative’, while in fact all they get is just a different quality print. And by quality I mean colours mostly. The composition or indeed the subject are not enhanced by the app – they’re still in the hands of the photographer. Therefore many Hipstamatic pictures, actually most of the ones I’ve seen, are bland or actually very bad. They do look different, particulary if compared with similar, untreated mobile snaps (after all Hipstamatic works with a 3mp mobile camera only), but they don’t necessarily make any of us more creative or turn us into better photographers.
The usual rules of composition still apply, the framing is still important and so is the subject. Hipstamatic will not improve anyone’s mediocre skills, I’m afraid.
Which is not to say we shouldn’t have fun with apps like Hipstamatic. Or its sister retro app, SwankoLab, which doesn’t allow you to take pics, but helps “develop” existing ones in a digitally recreated old-fashioned darkroom. Like Hipstamatic, it’s a lot of fun. But that’s what SwankoLab, Hipstamatic or The Best Cam are – fun apps and nothing more.
And like with many apps, the novelty will soon wear thin, the specially-created Flickr groups will overflow with thousands of mass-produced pics and we’ll jump on the next big thing.
For now however, retro is in.
The fox on the tube – and what photographers can learn
This is such a fascinating story – on many levels. But for photographers there’s one crucial lesson, which I’ll explain in a second.
A few days ago Kate Arkless-Gray, also known as @RadioKate, took this picture of an urban fox at Walthamstow tube station. It was late at night, the station was empty and the fox ran down the escalator only to be chased back up. And this is when Kate took the picture. With her iPhone. (She took another one with her Canon Ixus, both of which can be seen on her Flickr page).
Within hours of posting the image on Twitter, it went viral and captured the imagination of thousands of people worldwide. I read Kate’s updates on Twitter as she got more and more excited about the prospect of breaking yet another unexpected record number of views.
However, nothing has prepared Kate for the subsequent media reaction to this picture. Everyone, from the BBC to the Daily Mirror, from Metro to the Daily Telegraph picked up the story and ran the picture. Many bloggers – like Annie Mole or myself – picked it up too.
BBC Breakfast presenters had a chat about the fox and Japanese and other foreign media chase Kate for some more details and interviews. You can listen to the whole unbelievable story on Kate’s AudioBoo here:
But as a photographer and journalist I was fascinated by – and reminded of – one thing. It’s not the camera that counts, it’s the picture. Yes, it’s pretty obvious, but often forgotten.
In our endless pursuit of bigger, better cameras we forget that they won’t always necessarily give us pictures which capture our imagination. The tool almost doesn’t matter. Kate’s picture technically is far from perfect, but it hardly matters. Good photographers can take stunning pictures with almost any camera. Sometimes obviously they’re helped by the situation. (Although often even being the right person in the right place at the right time doesn’t help if you don’t trust your journalistic instincts or the sixth sense or whatever you want to call it – or simply can’t use the camera).
Earlier today I was looking at some of my early pictures taken with cheap, sometimes disposable cameras and I couldn’t help, but feel that they made me look at the world in a different way. They almost forced me to be more creative as – unlike all the modern gear, they didn’t offer that many fall-back options, if you know what I mean.
So let’s not obsess about the latest and the best – let’s think about what we can do with what we’ve got.
Kate’s fox also shows (again) the power of Twitter (as if we need another proof of its capabilities) in spreading information and reaching diverse audiences across the globe fast. A lot can also be said about media editors’ insatiable appetite for all things quirky and “fun”, but that’s probably something for a separate post.
The whole story with the picture reminded me of a quote I published months ago on my Tumblr. I cannot remember where I found it, so if you are its author and I can’t credit you – my apologies – but it succinctly captures the essence of what I wrote above:
An amateur photographer was invited to dinner with friends and took along a few pictures to show the hostess. She looked at the photos and commented “These are very good! You must have a good camera.”
He didn’t make any comment, but, as he was leaving to go home he said “That was a really delicious meal! You must have some very good pots.”
Image © Kate Arkless-Gray, used with author’s permission














