-
RECENTLY I WROTE:
- A quick trip back to Sorrento
- Vimeo relaunches with new features
- You wait for a bus…
- The miniature world of London commuters
- Some sound advice
- LCDVF: an entry-level viewfinder for DSLR film-makers
- Time for a refresh
- Google+ gets a new lightbox
- Hampshire frozen in time (capsule)
- What the new Canon C300 can do
favourites
Archives
My Twitter updates
- Broken boiler update: +12 in the bedroom overnight. BUT my woollen hat can also be used as an eye mask, so all is good. posted 55 minutes ago
- RT @the99percent: The Counter-Intuitive Benefits of Small Time Blocks - http://t.co/xvbJR0lo #recent99 posted 18 hours ago
- So, whose Pinterest boards are worth following? posted 18 hours ago
- Saturday colours - red http://t.co/UQ1OzFFI posted 20 hours ago
- Saturday colours - orange http://t.co/nb3WbRdK posted 20 hours ago
- Lovely: Red Fox Pouncing in Snow by Tin Man http://t.co/9zeWYmVF posted 22 hours ago
photography
multimedia and photojournalism
Me on Flickr
Javascript Flickr Badge, by Erik Rasmussen, requires javascript.Instagrams
Tag Archives: lens
Hampshire frozen in time (capsule)
A few weeks ago I mentioned that the New York Times had chosen a picture I took at the beginning of November during a weekend away in Petersfield, Hampshire to promote their “A world at 7 billion” project on their Facebook page. The paper wanted to create a time capsule for those who were born around the time when we broke the 7 billion people barrier and looked for submissions from all over the world. That picture, even though not my typical urban shot, was the only relatively decent – and vaguely relevant – one I took around that time.
I’m pleased to see it made the final selection and – along with many others – will now be preserved in a time capsule for those who were born at the end of 2011.
And when they grow up, what will they see when they look back at the recession-ravaged English corner of the world at odds with the rest of the European Union? This:
And if you live in or around Petersfield, pick up a copy of the Petersfield Herald today. They were very excited to discover their town had made it onto the pages of the New York Times…
Which Canon lens to choose?
How many times have you asked yourself this question (assuming that you own a Canon camera)? We all want to spend our money wisely and read endless reviews and comparisons, search for the best prices and pray that the next Lotto ticket solves all our photography kit problems. Actually, the last one might be just me, but never mind.
I don’t have sufficient knowledge of all Canon lenses, but filmmaker Michael Gebben found someone who does. On his website has posted a video in which a Canon guy compares seven prime lenses currently produced by Canon.
It was filmed during a recent workshop in New Orleans which was sponsored by Canon and it was clearly made with filmmakers in mind.
The quality of most of those lenses is stunning. My favourite is the 50mm f1.2 lens. Sharp, ultra-fast and ultra-desirable.
I won’t check its price for now. Will wait for that Lotto win.
Video found via Canon Filmmakers.
Related articles
- Canon Applies For Patent On New 24-70 F/2.8L Lens (crunchgear.com)
- The Best Telephoto Lens for Wildlife Photography: Buying Guide & Recommendations (brighthub.com)
- 102 Year Old Lens (e-clecticism.blogspot.com)
My nifty fifty
Every now and then I step out of my comfort zone and leave my lovely 24-104mm zoom lens at home. I take with me a random lens I normally don’t use (I don’t have zillions of them to choose from, sadly) and try to spend a whole day taking pictures just with this one lens – and nothing more.
Last weekend I did that with the Canon 50mm f1.8. And the past couple of days made me realise that in fact this is my favourite Canon lens so far.
After years of using zoom lenses or cameras with zoom capabilities, the ‘plastic’ 50mm was my first prime lens. Mainly because I couldn’t afford anything else.
At (then) just under £60, the lens offered fantastic quality, great speed and opened a new world of prime lenses for me. I remember when I swapped my old zoom lens for this one – and initially couldn’t cope with its simplicity. What? No zoom? You actually need to step back/forward? No image stabilisation?
No, none of those things. But, unlike my previous f4.0 lenses, this one let so much light in that I quickly realised what I’d missed before: the ability to take portraits (as this is when this lens really shines) in low-lighting conditions.
It does take a few attempts to get used to this new reality, if you’ve never used a prime lens. But the rewards are fantastic: crisp, punchy images, fantastic depth of field and the ability to take great pictures in challenging lighting conditions.

So why do I love it so much? Here’s why:
- It allows you to separate your subject from the background and makes it more prominent.
- It challenges you to rethink, reframe, refocus. You can’t stand in one place and rely on your zoom. You have to move and make the effort to frame the image.
- It’s absolutely indispensable for portrait shots. Whether it’s just one person on their own or a face in the crowd, you can focus on them and make their face – or a particular feature of it – a strong focal point of your image.
- It’s incredibly fast. If your standard lens’s aperture is in the region of f3.5-4, then working with a lens which allows you to get crisp images at night with f1.8 makes all the difference. Combine it with a good DSLR, which is capable of producing images at ISO 1600+ without any visible noise and you can really enjoy an evening photo walk without a flash.
- On a bright sunny day you can take images at extremely fast shutter speeds and either get really sharp images, or you can increase the exposure time and experiment with excessive light.
- You learn a lot about depth of field by shooting with this lens in different circumstances.
- It’s really small and light.

This list is probably not exhaustive.
I know its price has gone up in recent years, but it’s still incredibly cheap and I can’t wait to use it again.
Do you have a nifty fifty and – more importantly – do you give it as much attention as it deserves?














